Hello Scott Leomon.
You continue attacking me for being religious while offering no argument of substance on the issues I have brought.
I made my points clear, and have argued rationally. What has happened in court so far is history. It is facts. It cannot be opined away.
Yes, I object to your cavalier attitude to facts.
There is a certain arrogance in your admitted carelessness towards facts. This rubs me the wrong way, enough for me to bother wasting a few calories exposing your shallow speculation for what it is.
I have no need to bash you.
I came here merely to point out that your statements regarding who were delaying out the case were complete nonsense, and contrary to fact.
What followed is mere meta-discussion and of no interest, and as far as I am concerned, the argument is over. You lost it before you started by being unprepared.
However, I will allow myself one final observation, and that is that you avoid discussing facts, because you know that an argument based on fact will leave you up the creak withot a paddle. I understand. It is OK. There is no shame in losing.
I am amused that you think such pre-teen debate team tactics is enough to squeak out of this one. Nobody likes being exposed as a charlatan, so I understand your "defiance". And I can understand if you reacted to my tone.
Of course, you could just have admitted that you were wrong, and saved yourself the embarassment. |
