SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (223225)3/8/2007 4:46:03 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Tamerlane was a Muslim (I mistook him with great grandfather, Genghis Khan). But this is ALL that you got right. He certainly had no problems killing Muslims. He fought more Muslim kingdoms than non-Islamic ones. The list includes: Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Kuwait, Iran, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, etc. His invasion of India was against the Muslim ruler of Delhi. Similarly, he started a war with Bayezid I, sultan of the Ottoman Empire, and the Mamluk sultan of Egypt.

So no, he was not motivated by expanding the glory of Islam any more than Europeans who were busy slaughtering each other were motivated by expanding the "glory" of Christianity, even if they each cited God and Christ as their cause.

And all this, and it still does not apply to what I named: The Indian Mogul Caliphate of 1527-1856. Tamerlane was nearly 150 years before the time span and the dynasty I called for.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext