You ignored at least 95% of the points I raised.
When I read Sully's sources they are all publications that are notoriously right wing..
And I suppose TruthOut or MoveOn, so often used on those threads are examples of unbiased sources?
Or the NYT? Give me a break! Look at their editorial page. Their bias is clear enough.
The Washington Post? Are you kidding? Nobody had any idea which way Katherine Graham leaned, right?
Message 23354947
Or no cite at all?
Message 23354990
Is this what you call a rational argument?
Message 23356919
Or name calling? And it's pretty mild compared to AS and you know it.
I am especially referring to the American Spectator.
It's worse than MoveOn?
I would not believe a thing they published after reading David Brock's account of the lies that he helped publish while an editor there
Are you HONESTLY going to claim no left wing source has been proven to lie?
On money supplied by Richard Scharif, a millionaire twice over, the lies were created to discredit Clinton throughout his presidency.
And no equivalent has ever happened on the left? Want to bet? Take me up on this. I DARE YOU!!!!
Here, for starters:
Billionaire financier George Soros, a Kerry donor, has pledged $5 million to MoveOn.org to defeat Bush.
Schnur said there was an "absolute moral equivalency'' between the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth ads and ads produced by the Democratic groups.
"Anyone who lashes out on the swift boat ads without calling MoveOn and the other groups into account is the worst kind of hypocrite,'' Schnur said.
commondreams.org
BTW, CommonDreams is YOUR SIDE!
Looks at Sully's sources. They are from more than UNBIASED publications.. For every one that he posts I could find a counter post that would not only disagree but prove his claims false..
And I could find a counter source that would not only disagree but prove YOUR claims false.
You will always support the current administration and I cannot in all conscience.. do so.
You saw it and ignored it in the post you're responding to.
Message 23356691
Message 23357161
If you haven't seen a Republican do it, it's because you never read their posts on their threads. It's happened often enough. I've done it myself, saying no credible evidence exists tying Iraq to 911 AND, if you REALLY looked at it, the evidence of WMD in Iraq before the invasion was weak at best. And this is not the first time I've said it. I no longer have advanced search and can't dig up those posts, but I know others who can and will.
The challenge stands. You failed to call me. You are still free to do so. |
