SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (10332)3/12/2007 4:55:46 AM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (2) of 36917
 
It's my belief that it would not take much of an upset in climate to threaten the worlds production of food to support the current human population. Therefore it is most important that money and effort is spent on the study of the Earths climate and our effect on it. Perhaps more money should be spent on climate studies then on the war in Iraq (for example) as the threat is much larger in scope.

Both the GLOBAL DIMMING and GLOBAL WARMING component of human activity should be considered in any effect upon the planets climate. Any effect should be measured with it's relevance to overall effect of other natural factors wrt climate change.

By way of illustration, the data in these graphs need to be considered. (Note: in several cases todays date is on the left of the chart rather then the right hand side)









en.wikipedia.org
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News