SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : RGBL.OB RG Global Lifestyles, Inc.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: ROLLIN_N_BLING3/13/2007 10:07:54 AM
   of 337
 
Wyoming considers pipeline to handle coal-bed methane water

By The Associated Press
CASPER - The Wyoming Pipeline Authority is trying to determine whether it makes sense to develop a network of pipelines to carry coal-bed methane water away from the Powder River Basin and discharge it into the North Platte or Big Horn rivers.

Don Likwartz, supervisor of the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, said the amount of water being discharged by coal-bed methane wells is growing rapidly. He said that by the end of October 2006, the industry already had produced more water than it did in all of 2005. When the final numbers are in, Likwartz expects the industry will have produced 680 million barrels of water last year.

"It's going to be the highest year ever for water production," he said.

Some view that as a problem because of what's in the water. Some ranchers and landowners complain salts and other compounds in the discharged water kill trees and grass. Environmental regulators in Montana have sued Wyoming in an attempt to get the state to regulate methane water discharges into rivers that flow into Montana.
Brian Jeffries, director of the Wyoming Pipeline Authority, said during Tuesday's meeting that a system of pipelines could carry an estimated 100 million barrels of water per day to treatment-and-injection sites or to the Big Horn or North Platte rivers.

But it would cost about 30 cents per barrel.

"The reaction was that 30 cents seems on the high side of some of our current alternatives," Jeffries said.

Still, Jeffries said, many companies like the idea of a pipeline because it would take away some of the uncertainty they currently face because of litigation between Wyoming and Montana over water issues.

Copyright © 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Published on Wednesday, February 21, 2007.
Last modified on 2/21/2007 at 11:18 am
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext