SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tyc:> who wrote (35787)3/14/2007 6:35:31 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (2) of 78429
 
Yes, fine thinking... as is "this stock is going to the moon and I don't care what the warrant model shows the warrants to be worth because a non normally distributed (one directional up for instance) stock price renders an option models value of limited value". That is fine thinking. But that's not the same as "these warrants are cheap" which implies you're valuing the warrants vs the stock presumably using a standard options/warrant model unless otherwise discussed (like the above).

Typically claims like "RNG warrants are cheap" should come with either:

1.) context from previous discussions about E(RNG stock price movement).
2.) including the current IV implied by the warrant price.

DAK

DAK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News