Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 177.78

-2.2%

Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: slacker711 who wrote (60999)	3/15/2007 1:39:04 PM
From: JGoren	Read Replies (3) of 197153

Have they settled or not? BRCM-Qcom. I find it strange that they would settle Qcom's action against BRCM without a global settlement, including the ITC. The ITC thing seems weird. As I recall, the only infringement was on one patent that only had to do with when the handset is idle. Just on that basis alone, I can't see an injunction. Correct me if I am wrong. I still have serious problems with the ITC enjoining a product based on a US designed chip from US company that happens to be incorporated into a product coming back into the US. That is not what the ITC is there to do. It's to protect US from foreign anti-competitive actions.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next