The Environmentalist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (10427)	3/15/2007 6:20:33 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (2) of 36917

Dolts like you interpret the Gospel literally, i.e. that the world is only 5000 years old, that sun revolves around this flat earth, in "intelligent design". If you had your way, you'd have all scientific Biology books burned and replaced with the Holy Bible. It's true twatson that Meteorologists have trouble predicting short-term weather patterns. But, I'm not going to spell it out for you that it doesn't relate anything to the question of Global Warming. You just go ahead and bury your head in the sand and hold onto that firm believe that the Heavenly Father will reappear along with the 4-Horsemen of the Apocalypse and save us from the Devil (who's ultimately responsible for global warming). Incidently, you're correct that the IPCC report is FLAWED in being TOO CONSERVATIVE. For one thing, it doesn't account for the effects of polar ice-cap melting on the sea-level. It's far too conservative in it's estimate of 0.9m (thats about 3 feet) rise in sea-level over the 93 year period. Reputable scientists (not some blog ideologue or paid lobbyists) have come out stating this. A committee does tend to dullen the output. But the output still comes to dire conclusions, despite its dullness.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next