isopatch,
i saw a pattern of hubris' comments directed towards sinclair, and they certainly weren't positive in nature...
i may be over-reacting, but then again, i read what i see and interpreted hubris' comments as uninformed and partial in nature...
hubris' speculations concerning the "defense" of TRE shares via sinclair's e-mail blasts and an "intervention team" placing a bid under the shares are very loaded speculations...to accuse a ceo of a public company of that is to purport a violation of securities regulations...i found those comments to be not only misguided, but potentially defamatory...
perhaps, i have become too emotionally attached? well, maybe i'm attached, but emotionally implies a totally different twist on my behavior...sure, i'm attached to TRE because i think it is the best speculative investment in the marketplace...you're attached to constantly trading in and out of positions, and that's fine too...
lost the ability to be objective? of course that's open to one's perceptions, which are all relative...
by extension of your implication that i'm not objective, taking into consideration the fact that i've dedicated 90% of my networth to one company, would imply your perception that i must be completely insane...
billy |
