SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 258.86+9.0%Nov 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougSF30 who wrote (228186)3/16/2007 12:19:59 PM
From: TimFRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
You could have, but dual core chips are more likely to give some benefit to normal users than quad core. The speed of each core doesn't have to go down as much, and you get diminishing returns as you go to more cores. A lot of software will only use one core, but the base load of the OS and system functions, and anti-virus software etc. can run on the other. You probably don't need three cores to run that stuff. Also when you consider consumer software that does support multiple cores, a lot more of its supports 2 cores than 4.

For many server loads 4 cores can make sense, for systems designed to run specific highly highly threaded software it can make sense as well.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext