SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 196.80-8.4%10:07 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougSF30 who wrote (228196)3/16/2007 1:03:25 PM
From: TimFRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
My point was that going from 1 to 4, requires a bigger drop than 1 to 2

How is that relevant?


Its relevant because customers might decide that the drop in clock rate from single core is worth it to get double core, but that an additional drop isn't worth it for the diminishing marginal returns of more cores at this time.

Eventually its likely to be worth it. More experience with multi-core chips might lower the decrease in clock speed for each chip. More certainly and more importantly, the amount of software written for multiple cores (and the amount of cores some of this software can take advantage of) will increase.

For now I see dual core as the sweet spot for most PCs.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext