The Environmentalist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (10551)	3/18/2007 8:15:32 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) of 36921

Scientific illiterates are the crowd YOU are looking for - they accept the gospel of the new green religion without asking awkward question about just how anybody claims to differentiate anthropogenic greenhouse warming from non-anthropogenic greenhouse warming from other natural climate variation. As Michael Crichton has noted, once you start looking at the arguments, you find out that science is a whole lot less settled than the proponents claim. Al Gore says the Antarctic is melting. Climatologists agree 2% of the Antacrtic is melting but cannot agree whether the other 98% is getting warmer or colder. Which is why the proponents are pushing "post-normal science". If they had proof, they would show the proof. They only need "post-normal science" because as Mike Hulme says (he's one of your guys, remember?), "uncertainties are large". Has anybody yet come up with a model of greenhouse warming that includes cloud formation? yes or no? All I hear is attacking the messenger, whenever this question is asked.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next