Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 164.53

-0.4%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: slacker711 who wrote (61002)	3/18/2007 11:45:20 PM
From: rkral	Read Replies (1) of 197212

"The '338 patent was already withdrawn at the end of February so why is it showing up again?" I suppose it's possible that some - not all - claims regarding the '338 patent were withdrawn at the end of February. Qualcomm's PR only reads ... "The agreement also includes the dismissal of infringement claims under two of QUALCOMM's patents in Case No. 05 CV 1392, also pending in federal court in San Diego." -- qualcomm.com.br ... and apparently Broadcom didn't issue a PR. Would you please quote your source that identifies the two patents in this dismissal? TIA again, Ron

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next