SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 203.14-0.8%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (228516)3/20/2007 3:09:02 PM
From: pgerassiRead Replies (3) of 275872
 
Dear Sarmad:

This claim:

A more troubling issue is that SOI has higher “thermal resistance” than bulk CMOS. As a result, SOI transistors are forced to run at temperatures higher than necessary. Higher operating temperatures could cause long-term reliability problems.

Has been debunked by simple emperical evidence. See:

jobinyvon.com
soitec.com

You see that the layer is less than 100nm (1000A) thick. The wafer is 775um (microns) thick. That means the bulk silicon is 7700 times thicker than the oxide layer. The thermal resistance added is at most 0.1%. It is another Intel claim which is vastly over exaggerated. Intel's IHS adds far more thermal resistance than a bare die (shown to be over 10%), yet where is their claim that the IHS forces them to use far lower frequencies. They likely have far more variation due to the mating imperfections at the IHS die boundry.

And if they are so far off that claim, the initial one is likely to be equally far off. Heck one quarter of APM likely increases switching speeds more than the difference in published speeds. Beside what does Intel consider comparable leakage currents? And what leakage currents are they comparing? Do they include substrate leakage? If they don't, the statement is irrelevant and thus, worthless,

Pete
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext