Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neeka who wrote (199807)	3/20/2007 4:14:51 PM
From: Snowshoe	Read Replies (1) of 793952

>>Really would like to know why it is OK for Clinton to fire all 93 and Bush is getting such grief over the 8?<< The two matters are completely different. When a new administration takes office it's fairly typical to clear out the AGs. George Bush let go 91 out of 93 when he took office in 2001. The Bush firing of eight of his own AG appointees is highly unusual. One of those AGs prosecuted Republican Duke Cunningham for corruption, so there is an appearance of vendetta. This whole episode is the political equivalent of turning over your major ammunition depot to the enemy in wartime. The Bushies seem either totally hamfisted or politically suicidal.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next