Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elroy who wrote (200049)	3/22/2007 2:15:08 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) of 793799

If everything was legal, let them testify under oath with transcripts behind closed doors. No show trial, but all the info will be out there. The idea of disallowing transcripts of behind closed door testimony, under oath or not, is just weird. No so wierd, unfortunately. If Waxman's committee is acting in bad faith - and whipping up a show trial about this nothing is not an indication of good faith - then any discrepancies in testimony under oath are enough to get perjury investigations going, with a large contingent of Dems cheering them on because Karl Rove "deserves it" and shouldn't have been allowed to "get off" in the Plamegate investigation, facts notwithstanding. They have really left behind the pretence that there needs to have been a crime committed. Just give them testimony under oath, and they will manufacture the crime.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next