SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 154.13-3.3%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JeffreyHF who wrote (61332)3/22/2007 5:53:30 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) of 197297
 
Though the court ruled against QCOM, the material submitted by QCOM for consideration by the judge appears to contain points of law that could be appealed. I think QCOM ought to pursue an appeal on the law; namely that BRCM failed to meet the standard of clear and convincing evidence required for such a ruling.

The judge merely seconded the jury recommendation. But if an appellate panel determines that the evidence didn't meet the standard required by law, then the result would be far more satisfactory. I don't believe an appeal would cost all that much.

Art
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News