Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.95

-0.9%

1:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (61370)	3/22/2007 11:09:42 PM
From: Rich Bloem	Read Replies (1) of 197233

Carranza, you are getting your shorts all up in a bundle about this (probably from a lawyers viewpoint). Yeah, I don't like to hear Brewsters words, but there is no way that he can prevail on appeal. When he says, Q didn't follow the SSO's "unwritten understanding" well, since when is that a legal foundation?? This decision will be appealed faster than you can say "Pancho did it". On the down side, I don't like the tone of how things are going and maybe the short term hit to the stock price, but I have complete confidence that Q will come out of these legal wrestling matches with a convincing win. That said , a couple of black eyes are all in the spirit of the match.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next