Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jlallen who wrote (225018)	3/23/2007 10:23:15 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 281500

"Not in this case. These are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the President....he does not need a reason to can one or all of them..." I agree, in this case a reason is not required; However if one is/was advanced it must be supported, otherwise there is grounds for wrongful termination. IMO... I'm probably wrong or a case would already have been filed. One ought to be IMO, and it ought to be easy to win. We ought not be able to go about alleging things that aren't true about our honored representatives ... ought we not? or is that too knotty/naughty?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next