Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (61448)	3/24/2007 2:36:47 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) of 197271

Mq, as your self-appointed solicitor, abogado, avocat and avocado charging you an the current price of an ounce of gold per hour in half hour increments, let me say this: you are wrong The content of the hidden like a now-you-see-them-now-you-don't-Nokia-WCDMA-handset-in-the-year-2000 emails apparently did influence the judge's decision. But my larger point is that my confidence in the Q's legal eagles is shaken by the whole experience which exhibited inept lawyering on many fronts, not just the emails. But it's a dead horse I've thoroughly beaten, so I will stop. You may PM me if you wish to continue the discussion.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next