Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 156.53

+1.6%

3:46 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (61441)	3/24/2007 4:42:30 PM
From: lml	Read Replies (1) of 197300

So, IMO, the Q lawyers either did an exteremely poor job of document gathering in preparation for trial or intentionally hid the documents or got bushwhacked. The fact that they had the documents in their possession then had to produce them after the witness discussed them on the very last day suggests to me that they probably hid them, but it is hard to say to a 100% certainty. I think you're blowing this way out of the proportion, as well as drawing extreme conclusions without anywhere near the information sufficient give merit to any of your conclusions. Missing a one particular email is NOT "bad lawyering." There's a lot more to lawyer that sifting through someone's email inbox. This work is typically performed by younger associates, & given the volume of discovery & time constraints, missing something of relevance is always a risk. Goal is to minimize risk, but no one law firm will ever eliminate it.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next