Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 230.23

-4.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: combjelly who wrote (228850)	3/24/2007 10:59:57 PM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz	Read Replies (2) of 275872

>> As I understand it, APM doesn't model the devices. It monitors the parameters that are used and the measured results on the test structures. It then keeps a database of tweaks and the results. That is exactly the reason that I don't expect APM to give good results at 65 nm. Again, relying on the Intel paper, the randon atomic states do not recur on reruns of the step. So whatever tweak was needed on one run is not applicapable to the next run. Nor to other samples in the same run. >> And you base this on what, exactly? Their performance at the easier (by comparison) 65 nm node. I am sure immersion brings new challenges.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next