The Environmentalist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: maceng2 who wrote (10912)	3/25/2007 5:03:07 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) of 36917

I have made quite clear that oism.org has used unrefuted as honest data and written logical and rational explanation and descriptions of the issues concerning global warming and the speculation as to possible guesses of causes and effects. hiding behind you anonymous handle you have accused me of lying and posting lies with no examples. Pearly_Button is the example of the cowardly anonymous poster of slander and lies. What below is dishonest in any way. It is my opinion and analysis. Only an idiot would suggest decades of data can extrapolate any kind of certain projections on centuries level natural interactions. It does not matter how many times the science ignoramus clicks refresh or read technical information. The few decades of satellite temperature data mean nothing in global warming timeframes and prove nothing. That data is like a few pixel view of a gigapixel image. How amusing to compare a provider of energy needed in every aspect of modern civilization and a mailman who delivers paper. What insight of comprehension is revealed by that comparison. One reason the term ?"dumber than a bag of hammers" was invented.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next