SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 230.93-2.8%3:07 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougSF30 who wrote (228915)3/25/2007 8:10:23 PM
From: neolibRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
It does sorta look like that at the moment, doesn't it? :)

I doubt it. I suspect Intel's manufacturing is just better than AMD's, not that AMD's design is less manufacturable. Now true, AMD's design is less manufacturable on AMD's process than Intel's design is on Intel's process, and one is justified in saying that is what counts. But it is useful to isolate the problem IMO.

BTW, one of the biggest failures in American corporate history is that Intel decided not to pioneer and own the IC foundry business given their process prowess. Of course, the same might have been said for IBM as well at one point.

There is another issue that does not get a lot of discussion which is SOI vs non-SOI. Clearly Intel has chosen to continue avoiding it, while AMD is wedded. It is possible that some of AMD's 65nm problems are related to SOI design or process issues, which Intel does not have. At any rate, I'd say AMD's 65nm SOI process is a more complex one than Intel's non-SOI 65nm process.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext