explain myself?
welcome back.
now,
what are you talking about? for that is the true puzzle
hans think xiongnus are derived from hans? you are joking, surely, or read someone who was, of course.
history, fyi, is everything, and on this point we differ, as indicated by you believing very fanciful happening, such as but not limited to ...
- it is possible to win in afghanistan, reign in mesopotamia and rule in persia
- gold is no good
- exchange rate doesn't matter
- debt is not a problem
- greensputin is great
- burnandkaput is better
- houses that all go up in price is good, perhaps because property taxes follow, and debt is not a problem, or something along those lines, and
- satellite ... oh never mind, i must behave properly
As you did not respond to me to parameterize what we can and cannot discuss, and has invoked the use of my handle, i feel it is fair game to respond to anything you choose to say about me, to me, even if not directly addressing me, in whatever tact you pick to do, in exactly the same way as I always had, to respond with upmost kindness, and remind you that you are wrong, because your motivations are not pure, view constrained, analysis faulty, and so all is understandable in context.
chugs, j
P.S. feels like the thread i enjoy ... maurice back, cb aware ... wonderful |