Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 155.82

-1.3%

Jan 23 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: rkral who wrote (61570)	3/27/2007 4:01:33 PM
From: Jim Mullens	Read Replies (1) of 197341

Re: "Does this suggest that the Q’s royalty rate proposed to NOK in the license extension position is actually higher that the current contracted rate???????" No, "exact same terms" per Steve Altman. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually that statement pertains to the option to extend thru 2008, and not, by my read, to the terms of the new license renewal/ extension being "negotiated". Message 23220626 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Not only that, at their [edit: Nokia's] request -- and think about this in terms of a FRAND commitment, of whether they really viewed it as not being in accordance with FRAND -- they obtained an option to be able to extend the exact same terms of that [edit: 2001 license] agreement which they could exercise anytime to the end of '08" -- Steven Altman, London Analyst Day (1:15:25)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next