SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 389.75+0.5%Dec 1 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: longnshort who wrote (16053)3/27/2007 9:59:56 PM
From: Moominoid  Read Replies (2) of 218135
 
There's mostly not enough resolution in the data to see that. But if it is the case it makes sense for the ice ages as the cycles were driven by the Milankovich solar cycle. Associated chanegs in carbon dioxide are the result of some feedback with vegetation growth changes in peat etc. So they are going to lag after the start of the warming trend. But they serve to increase the effect.

A guy called Ruddiman has done some very interesting work on the past 10,000 year period looking at the interaction of solar radiation, methane, and CO2 over the whole post-Ice Age period. He published an article in Scientific American a couple of years back. It's worth looking at for everyone or each side of this so-called debate.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News