SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation
DJT 11.36-3.6%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (103301)3/28/2007 3:19:05 AM
From: Proud Deplorable  Read Replies (1) of 361417
 
"The worst case is painful to contemplate. If the US and/or Israel follow through on their implied threats to deal militarily with Iran, this may constitute the most dangerous and fateful international gamble in decades."

This is all a lot of noise IMO. Iran has been content to sit back and let the US army get softened up by the unwinnable war in Iraq to the point where Bush needed to send reinforcements (surge) whose real purpose is to fight off an invasion from Iran after the USA or Israelis attack Iran. At first, just as in Iraq, the Iranians will lose some infrastructure and some weaponry but they are entirely capable of invading Iraq and wiping out every living US soldier in the region.

Anyway its not going to happen because Putin says no to an invasion. Thats the FINAL word. If he says to the US they better scale this down then he has the last word as he is capable of destroying the USA 100 times over. People forget that both the US and Russia have enough weapons to destroy the Earth 100 times.

All this war stuff is rubbish IMO. It won't happen.

The UK has no business being in Iranian waters OR Iraqi waters. They should go home and behave themselves.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext