Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 155.82

-1.3%

Jan 23 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (61681)	3/29/2007 4:21:45 PM
From: rkral	Read Replies (1) of 197351

>>>Not that it matters I suppose (both are high enough up in the QCOM chain IMO), except to pickers of nits>>> Refer to Q web link of transcript for those especially concerned (page 4) >>> qualcomm.com; <<< The attribution in that transcript is incorrect. Listen for yourself at the 1:52:45 point for the Christin Armacost question and reply. investor.qualcomm.com Perhaps you should write Qualcomm IR to advise them of such. And before you go calling people names, you at least should ... not perhaps should ... be sure you are correct. Your apology will be accepted, if offered.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next