Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 156.34

+1.4%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: BDAZZ who wrote (61747)	3/30/2007 2:42:55 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (3) of 197305

But you can imagine QCOM agreeing to a clause that would allow Nokia to infringe for a year and a half with no consequences? Yes, for two reasons.... 1) If there was an explicit clause that voided the option due to Nokia infringing, Qualcomm would have stated that in an investor conference. They are only making the argument to the analysts because it is going to be dependent on getting a court to agree. 2) Could you have imagined that there was no punishment for violating the non-disclosure rule? TI's exec told the world about the royalty-free cross license and there was no penalty. Slacker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next