SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (225749)3/30/2007 10:56:05 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
So you think Iran wouldn't be blowing up Russians, if they had invaded Iraq, or Swedes, or Malaysians?

No, I just think that you wouldn't be calling Iran "an occupier subject to attack" if they seized any part of Iraq.

As my odd inferences, they have been shaped by a consistent pattern of left-leaning opinion. For five years, we have heard the loud cries of "Geneva Conventions! Geneva Conventions!" with regard to the terrorists in Gitmo, and any US action in Iraq, but now that Iran kidnapped British sailors from the Persian Gulf, and parades them on TV and makes them read 'apologies' - all in clear violation of Geneva Conventions, do we here a peep from the Left? Not a whisper.

One can only conclude that they think international law should be binding only on the US, not other countries.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext