SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 156.34+1.4%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (61847)4/2/2007 3:15:56 PM
From: limtex  Read Replies (2) of 197300
 
AB- I think the various NOK statements show what they mean. They argue that Qs patents are not as relvants as they onece were and from what I recal they have even said they expect to be net recipients from the Q.

Now they may not mean it in thier heart of hearts ( or they may) but their lawyers are going to argue this in courts for the next four years or more.

Then there comes the question as to whether Q would ever win an outright total victory.Sure Q might win but all it takes is one little patent somewhere in the myriad of patents that make up a cdma handset to make a judge say well......Q get most but NOK has defiantely made avlauable contribution here and ...well.......I'll sort of split the difference.

Thats what I see happening if anything but it won't happen for at least four years and then as I say it may just fade away.

Best,

L
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News