SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 155.56-1.4%2:50 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: limtex who wrote (61874)4/3/2007 8:12:41 AM
From: rkral  Read Replies (1) of 197336
 
"In any case I must have read it here and I remembered it."

So it appears, and the paragraph relevant to this discussion is ...

"Once Nokia has ceased actually designing and making CDMA phones, the responsibility for paying royalties on that technology to Qualcomm will pass to its eventual ODM partner(s). That will leave Nokia to pay Qualcomm royalties only for the IPR it owns in GSM and W-CDMA, while Qualcomm will also have to pay Nokia for its IPR in those areas, which may actually work out with Qualcomm owing it more than it owes Qualcomm." -- Rik Turner, tinyurl.com

Firstly, notice there are no quote symbols anywhere in that paragraph. Therefore, representing any part as a Nokia statement is inaccurate -- a misrepresentation.

Secondly, handset ASPs are about 10x chipset ASPs. So even if Nokia owed Qualcomm only for WCDMA and GSM IP, and Qualcomm owed Nokia for WCDMA, GSM and CDMA IP ... it's hard to imagine any plausible royalty rates and market shares that would support a conclusion of Nokia being the "net recipient."

Moreover, while formal accounting will show ODM's paying royalties to Qualcomm, isn't Nokia effectively paying the tab when they buy the handsets from the ODM?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext