Boy, what a slippery slope this topic represents...
It is not my intent to garner further debate on this subject, but the collapse of the three buildings in NYC on 9/11, according to many expects, was such a statistical anomaly that it could be considered impossible.
I am not an engineer, but am a pilot.
The novice research I have done w/ regards to the collapse of three steel buildings due to fire and limited structural damage, has led me to question the official accounts.
According to what I have read, there is not one single similar collapse of the steel structure building anywhere in the world. Much less, 3 in one day.
And, after viewing the BBC video footage reporting the collapse of building seven, complete w/ specific details of the collapse, all the while building seven stood erect in the background, is, to me, proof positive there is more to the story than meets the eye.
How does one explain a live BBC news report w/ a live shot of ground zero, w/ a reporter detailing the collapse of a building that has yet to collapse?
I am at a loss.
ZM |
