I figure at least 50% of the booming soon-to-be retired can be, and should be, considered as have-nots, because they will not make it without almost devine intervention, or massive confiscation and redistribution, on biblical scale, and then not make it in all cases - the math simply does not work because too many folks believe as You once did, that debt doesn't matter, and Bush is a good guy.
whether there will be revolution or not is beside the point, which is that anything can happen during a lengthy and dark interregnum.
so far, in our continuing dialogue, I have been more right than wrong, and you more wrong than right.
you are of course free to think otherwise, but makes no difference.
the epic journey to teotwawki, as I say often enough, is a trip to be educated on and enjoyed
we get to test out theories, try out strategies, and discuss counter-measures
what fun
as to knowledge of usa, let's say I know more about america than you do, else how can I have been more right than you
and you know less about hong kong than I do, else I would not bother to remind you so often ... I mean, you don't even cognize the sino-uk treaty of one country two systems
I actually expect not very much from anyone and you think a pointless import duty against your largest short t-bill creditor is no big deal (how about doubling the tax rate of fannie mae? would that be a big deal?), whereas a filing of small displeasure by the counterparty is an over reaction.
terribly amusing, no?
chugs, j |
