<<"How can you justify seeing a mother away from her home, her children? Why don't they respect family values in the West?' he asked of the British government.>>
... good question. sensitive, delicate, not diplomatic to ask, but good question in all cases.
it would of course not be the case that britains do not care about human life, and all of the rest of the nonsense that all spin-masters would accuse the opposition of, like during vietnam war, say, where cb ilaines of this world tried to prolong and enforce positions built up by freedom-loving french long past their use-by date by napalming little girls crossing rivers while embraced by their moms
as the cb ilaines of that time were similarly on a mission to spread goodness all around even as they destablized cambodia by bombing that monk-filled faith-based nation, leading directly to the killing field episode
now, the cb illaines of this world is on a different mission, to make sure that theocracy is established everywhere, by allying with weak kneed and wobbly coalition of the less than willing, and financed by the usual and same lot who endorses laws that set tokyo age of consent at 13 and OK-ed vending machines to satisfy wierdos urge to sniff teenagers underwear, and, who deny the equivalent of holocaust in asia |
