Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.82

+0.1%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (62010)	4/5/2007 8:25:24 AM
From: scratchmyback	Read Replies (1) of 197032

<<Why is continuance of delay tactics deemed more important than focusing on more permanent resolution mechanisms?>> Come on, Nokia is looking for a permanent solution. They are paying $20m for the use of Qualcomm's UMTS patent, and that is the level that Nokia sees as a proper one. And of course, Nokia is probably willing to negotiate about the level of royalties. There is also no reason to doubt that Nokia wants to find a permanent solution for the level of royalties that Qualcomm should pay Nokia for the use of Nokia's GSM/CDMA/WCDMA patents. Of course, it would be easier to negotiate, if Qualcomm would state what they see as a proper level of royalties for Nokia's patents.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next