Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.81

0.0%

Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: manalagi who wrote (62061)	4/5/2007 9:41:34 PM
From: voop	Read Replies (1) of 197035

Are you saying that the 20 million is for 9 days in April because Nokia previously claimed not going to pay Q after April 9? that's my story and I am sticking to it! Nokia acknowledges the current agreement is through or until April 9. Nokia claims they are "paid up" after that time. So the payment they proffer is for 9 days at $20 million. Obviously they dispute they owe anything at all after nine days in April. Therefore they acknowledge that those 9 days are worth $20 million. Cleary they are inferring that a license that would not expire during said quarter would be worth $200 million, since 9 days out of 90 in a quarter is worth $20 million. Qualcomm should accept the $20 million and expect treble damage for willful infringment if Nokia has decided not to pay for a license portfolio that still have valid unexpired patents.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next