SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RetiredNow who wrote (332205)4/8/2007 11:48:07 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1571111
 
Tejek, of course they were gathering intelligence on Iran. The whole purpose of boarding vessels in those waters is to interdict war materiel from Iran before it reaches insurgents in Iraq. British and US military know that Iran is helping the insurgency, so they are trying to limit the amount of munitions like IEDs from making their way to the insurgents. So the British personnel's admission that they were gathering intel on Iran is not an admission at all.

They are spying on Iran. That's not just checking vessels for munitions.

Anyone with any knowledge of what's going on over there at all would have told you the same exact thing. Hell, if you'd asked, I would have told you that is what they were doing. But interdiction of Iranian munitions headed to Iraq does NOT mean they were in Iranian waters.

Both Bush and Blair have lied to us........repeatedly. The onus is on them. I think they are lying about this ship as well.

They can do those tasks just as easily once they are in Iraqi waters and the British have some pretty compelling evidence that they were in Iraqi waters. The two most compelling pieces of evidence are the following:

Sorry. You misunderstood the article. Its not just about boarding vessels. Its about spying on what Iran is doing. To do that, you have to be closer to Iran than in Iraqi waters.

1) the picture of the Brit soldier standing on the moored ship that was boarded holding a GPS device with Iraqi coordinates on it
2) the fact that the original GPS coordinates given to the Brits from Iran were 1.7 miles in IRAQI waters

I don't care. Its probably faked.

So all in all, the story could go either way, but right now it's pretty solidly on the side of the British doing exactly what they've been mandated by the UN to do:

From your POV............you want to believe the Brits and the Americans are the good guys no matter how much info you get to the contrary. That's the difference between you and I....I have read enough and seen enough to know that's not true.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News