Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 177.78

-2.2%

Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: NickLemb who wrote (62282)	4/9/2007 9:34:48 PM
From: waitwatchwander	Read Replies (1) of 197155

Nokia: “Nokia has until 2007 paid less than 3 per cent cumulative license fees under all of its patent license agreements involving WCDMA products.” QUALCOMM: “Nokia's claim that it has been paying cumulative royalties of no more than 3% on WCDMA products sold through 2007 is intentionally deceptive and misleading. Nokia has been paying a royalty on WCDMA handsets in excess of 3% to QUALCOMM alone.” The above statement differences may only be a case of each party using a different base for their percentages and/or Nokia is already collecting wcdma royalties from other parties. Both Nokia and Qualcomm should be required to set their public records straight as soon as possible or be prepared to face the rath of the SEC. During the next set of conference calls, someone from the analyst community should ask both parties to clarify how they tally their percentages. Maybe Mr Ed will pick up this ball. We'll see !!!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next