Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 177.78

-2.2%

Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric L who wrote (54524)	4/10/2007 2:08:46 PM
From: rkral	Read Replies (2) of 197153

"As you've probably noticed the ETSI IP database is a bit tricky to search. Searching on the patent title 'Reverse Link, Transmit Power Correction' in that database turns up patent number 0695482 (European Patent Office, SPAIN, FRANCE, UNITED KINGDOM, ITALY, SWEDEN) ..." European Patent 0695482 is no longer considered ESSENTIAL IPR. "On 29 November 2006, Qualcomm Inc. has requested ETSI to withdraw the following IPR from the ETSI IPR Online Database: Patent No.: EP 0695482; Patent No.: DE 69520812.8; Patent No.: US 5,452,473; Patent No.: ZL95190118.4. Qualcomm Inc. has been caused to re-examine thoroughly the essentiality of this patent family in the course of patent litigation and as a result does not consider that these patents are Essential IPRs. Following this request, ETSI has removed the above mentioned Patent numbers from the above declaration." From Qualcomm Inc. U.S. Patent 5,590,408 at webapp.etsi.org As the FRAND argument then doesn't apply that might actually be to Qualcomm's advantage ... if Nokia indeed infringes.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next