Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 177.78

-2.2%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: rkral who wrote (62330)	4/10/2007 4:01:44 PM
From: Eric L	Read Replies (2) of 197145

We Examined Our Conscience and ... ... decided "to re-examine thoroughly the essentiality of this patent family in the course of patent litigation and as a result does not consider that these patents are Essential IPRs." Ron, << European Patent 0695482 is no longer considered ESSENTIAL IPR. ... As the FRAND argument then doesn't apply that might actually be to Qualcomm's advantage ... >> At the very least it saves them from being called low down dirty rotten pond scum by their peers for surfacing their submarine. <g> Good catch. Did you happen to search up any of the other submarine patents previously declared to be essential? - Eric -

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next