SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 178.41+0.1%12:46 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Raglanroadie who wrote (62463)4/12/2007 12:56:57 PM
From: JGoren  Read Replies (2) of 196964
 
Just because Qcom under priced in 2001, doesn't justify overpricing now is the retort. If we believe that royalties should be negotiated and fairness is determined by the market, then the 2001 license was fair. That raises the question of what factors go into determining fair price. Qcom settled for less because it wanted a toe hold in a market, needed to develop the market back in 2001. Well, how does that translate into today's environment?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News