Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.81

0.0%

Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric L who wrote (62562)	4/13/2007 5:24:09 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Read Replies (1) of 197032

EL--Once again, as I noted previously to rkral, the issue here is whether Nokia may have issued contradictory PUBLIC information. Whether it is in the form of a particular SEC filing is unimportant. Whether it deceives the public IS important, and it appears that the contradictory statements coming from Nokia could be used as a basis for either a civil shareholder suit or a criminal action (in New York State, maybe not elsewhere). We are dealing with a company whose behavior, to say the least, is appalling. And this is part of a pattern on the part of Nokia, making one wonder why anyone would want to do business with them. Qualcomm, in my view, would be perfectly justified in terminating all agreements with Nokia, letting the chips fall where they may (no pun intended). Art

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next