Uranium Stocks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Uranium Stocks

URNM 55.98

-1.1%

Dec 26 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: AuBug who wrote (10345)	4/13/2007 6:32:28 PM
From: lowerSharpnose	Read Replies (2) of 30242

DJ... The bizarre thing about this statement that "...already nearly a 40% shortfall in production from what is being consumed..." is we have yet to see a single nuclear reactor shut down for lack of fuel. Reminds me of silver, demand has aledgedly exceeded supply for decades yet we have no problem buying silver. Stockpiles are at historically low levels. They have been depleted during this supply squeeze. Only the down-blending of ex-Russsian warheads has kept things in check. Utility companies have been delaying purchases because prices were so high. This has reduced demand, but not consumption. The stockpiles, which act as a necessary buffer, have done their job. Purchases can only be deferred so long. Sure the U business is cyclical. The question is how high will the peak be and how low the next trough? An honest question : Why do you hold U stocks when your outlook is so confused? rgds lowerSharpnose ps allegedly not aledgedly - it is picked up by the spell checker.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next