WINSPEAR FACTS-NOT HYPE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : WINSPEAR FACTS-NOT HYPE

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Crocodile who wrote (31)	10/3/1997 6:13:00 AM
From: George J. Tromp	of 135

HI All: A few caveats in reference to the latest release. I see the bulk of future expenditures focused on Snap Lake diamond sources. As chuck has referred to and my references in previous posts. The sources are in the lake. Deeper drilling is in order. The fact that the dyke area has revealed no surficial expression nor 186., lends support to my theory that the wide indicator train dispersal and shedding is related to glacial deposition of highly bearing diamond sources from with in the lake. Boulders up to 50Cm may lend support to the fact that this kimberlite and others were subject to severe pyroclastic eruptions which may be linked to volatile kimberlitic sources and venting action. IMHO there is no doubt that the sources have vented into Snap Lake. George BTW: How many diamond exploration companies have a 2 month turnaround from til sampling to indicator picking and evaluation of those samples and are able to conclude several areas on the properties are worth followup work? Winspear has shown a speedy turnaround from til sampling thru the testing stage. This process can take several months., without in-house processing of samples.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next