SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 230.41-3.0%9:52 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: niceguy767 who wrote (229919)4/14/2007 1:16:42 PM
From: neolibRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
This weeks EETimes has a front page article on foundries push to 45nm for late this year. TSMC is pulling in their's a bit (Sept for first customer wafers instead of Q4), with UMC and IBM/Chartered/Samsung shortly behind by years end.

However, a scary stat listed in another article (p60) makes the following claim:

At 65nm an IDM needs $8.3B/yr in sales to be profitable.

At 45nm the estimate is $13.3B/yr

At 32nm the estimate is $16.7B/yr.

This is looking at the cost to an IDM for the entire process node, so it is independent of #/fabs (at least my reading).

To what degree AMD can lower this bar by tying in with IBM/Chartered I'm not sure. Clearly AMD is not hitting the 65nm metric, and the odds of them growing to the 45nm level in the time required is zero.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext