Not all that I read TJ, just that which agrees with other things which I know from observation to be true. <you really do believe the crap you read, don't you.>
For example, some things you write make sense, other things you write are merely a reflection of your false ideas.
I take it that you don't think my Genghis Y chromosome theory is correct and ready for a Nobel Prize? Your reaction was further evidence that my theory is correct - an emotional, irrational, Genghis style reaction, which is why China will remain just an also-ran, despite the "accident" being, theoretically, but not really, over. It's in the DNA there. DNA is destiny.
Genghis DNA was good for the time, but it is passe. You can sublimate your Genghis urges in shoot 'em up games in cyberspace where you won't do yourself actual harm.
It would be best not to fall prey to enacting your urges for real in regard to Taiwan.
Since [despite your thinking to the contrary] China does have some variation in DNA and thinking, it is not a slam dunk that Hu and the mindless megalomaniac automaton Genghis clones will enact their chromo-lattice drives to attack the peaceful people of Taiwan.
Was there something in particular where you found a mistake in what I quoted? I guess not or you'd have pointed out a fault.
It's great to be back to help you on your road to enlightenment. I should self-ban again though, as my generous and unpaid educational efforts could be deployed towards a more appreciative student [me for a start - need cup of tea and read the paper and get out of bed].
Mqurice |
