Sioux Nation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation

DJT 14.13

+1.6%

Jan 21 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (104679)	4/14/2007 9:14:23 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) of 362464

And yes those young men from Duke were wronged to a much higher degree than the gals from Rutgers. I don't know that I agree. The men from Duke were wronged while in actions they should not be proud of. It's more like they were being played from a nasty con, and as W.C.Fields revealed - You can't cheat an honest man. The gals from Rutgers, on the other hand, were ambushed for a performance that should make them, their families, and their school most proud. I think the Duke case is one of finding that those who play in the dirt sometimes find themselves soiled more than they expected, while the Rutgers case was a drive-by cheap shot for which the girls were no way whatsoever associated with the sleeze factor of the situation. I know that I disagree. The Rutger's gals had the greater degree of harm. TP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next