SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 374.27-0.2%Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Slagle who wrote (17157)4/15/2007 4:24:41 PM
From: Seeker of Truth  Read Replies (1) of 218006
 
Why was Roosevelt required to sell U.S. oil to an invader
of China, guilty of so many massacres of Chinese people?
U.S. oil was all that FDR could control. He was not the ruler
of the world. You said he got the U.S. into the (unjust?) war
with Japan. It seems to me that the Japanese high command
is the one that got the US there. Roosevelt responded to their
attack on Pearl Harbour by appealing to the Congress for a
declaration of war. What did the Republicans really want
in those days? Rule of Asia by Japan, Europe by the Nazis?
Did the US attack Japan first or did Japan attack the US
first? Not all history books lie, read one or two.
Why did the US have to consider Japanese demands(for
Chinese territory) at all? If a crook wants your bank account
but he agrees to make less extreme demands and he will
settle for discussions about getting your car, are you
obliged to be reasonable and consider the matter? And in
any case no part of China belonged to the US. It's as if
the crook wanted discussions with ME about legalizing his
grab of Slagle's car.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext